Non-PPR, owner getting Tebow has no backup QB.
Wallace may be the best player in the trade, but you can make a case that Maclin/DJax are 1A/B, Cam is a top 7 QB this season and Green is a top 15-20 WR.
Owner getting Tebow is better off just picking up some QB on the wire, giving up way too much.
It's quite a hall, but I always like getting the best player in the trade. Depends on how the rest of your team shakes out, but for the #1 or 2 RB in fantasy you get 3 guys inside the top 20 at their respective positions.
3 starters for 1, sign me up. You lose AD, but you get 2 WR2s and a RB2-3. Just make sure you aren't too thin at RB if you make the deal.
Putting a lot of faith in Shannahan and Torain that he retains value. You know AD's #s are gonna be there in the end no matter how bad the Vikes are.
LLoyd was suprisingly effective with Tebow behind center, I think that pushes the needle just enough to favor manager A.
It is pretty fair, but I would be worried about Hardesty stealing Hillis' touches, and Rivers hasn't exactly been elite this year.
if you call the QBs and Lloyd/Maclin a wash, who would you rather have Fitz or Hillis? For me it's Fitz. Clevand can't really move the ball.
I agree with most of the previous comments. I think A side gets the better end of the trade. Out of the 6 players i think fitz and lloyd have the most upside.
agree, its pretty fair, but I would rather have side A. Hillis also just hasn't looked the same as last year.
In 1799, Jean Genevieve Garnerin jumped from a hot air balloon, making her the first female parachutist.
"You don't play against opponents, you play against the game of basketball." - Bobby Knight